Critical Response Comparative Analysis Assignment. (Risk taking, which Essay

Critical Response Comparative Analysis Assignment. (Risk taking, which is the name of the chapter that has the 2 articles) - Essay Example Heroes and heroines are an important people in the whole of human race despite the action a hero does or a heroin does. Heroism has a profound belief in the value of human beings and the dignity of all human race regardless of whether one is a victim or not. This paper will outline and describe various critical analyses on how profound heroism has evidently evolved in the feminism characters and comparisons to that of masculine characters. Miriam Polster, author of the article Eve’s Daughter states that moving beyond stereotypic class of heroes makes s conclude that ordinary men and women are heroes. Heroes in everyday may not receive an accorded acclaim. However, private heroism becomes precise because people see their heroes every day; their heroes are so near as family, co-workers, and neighbors. Heroes have a profound respect for human life, a sense of personal effectiveness, mental courage, and original perspective about the world. People measure heroism in terms of publi city. They think that a hero is that big figure hat is seen every day, affects greatly in to the society, and largely distinguished from others. The fact is, heroism is characterized with basic traits that do not create hierarchy heroic actions but rather appreciation of ordinary guise and heroic elements. Ted Tollefson, author of article, Is a hero really nothing but a Sandwich?, describes many heroic figures like Warren Spahn, Elvis, Kennedy Carl Jung, Ben Hogan among others who have reflected back to Ted and what he intended to become. He wished to have good moves, become an electrifying orator as well as sex symbol. Ted shows how many of the generations have weaknesses for hero-worshipping as try to shed skins of their heroes like serpents. The people reach a point at which they start questioning about their heroes and why they need them. Ted explains that a number of people with heroic figure have common character traits despite the immense cultural differences. However, the re ason as to why they remain heroes is that activity they did of which, everyone else talks about. Ted explains how heroes live a life worth imitation that comes in with a number of benefits of zest and meaningful life (Tollefson, 1993). In the context of Eve’s daughter, you find that women have moved beyond a stereotype class of heroes where many of the women and men who are stated as heroes receive similar acclaims heroism and are accorded classic values of heroism, which are precisely equal to each other. Everyday heroes rise as different and difficult challenges arise too. The manner of tackling difficulties is different from one hero to another. In the context of People who make changes, heroism is a mere common place setting in response to challenges that affect more women that are vulnerable. In this context, inventory of heroism contain heroic characters, which are common to a bigger a number or all of the figures in the heroism state. Most of the heroes respect the hum an dignity and hold one accord for life. Heroism tries to solve challenges without hurting the victimized people. In this manner, the people a hero fights for appreciate him or her for standing in the place of the victims. When the challenge is drawn to the end, celebrations are held. The most enjoys the most is the hero himself for the privileges he gets from the people he or she helped (Polster, 2001). The mental courage in heroes permits them to be aware and accept the way people are in regard to their self-reliance and contribution of

Anton Chekovs A Marriage Proposal Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Anton Chekovs A Marriage Proposal - Essay Example His fundamental focus is on the common man, their lives and problems and the manner in which they deal with them. A similar situation is also observed in the play â€Å"A Marriage Proposal†. As the name suggests the play is about Ivan Vassiliyitch or Lemov proposing Stepan Stepanovitch’s or Tschub’s daughter Natalia Stepnaovna. Although the play is extremely hilarious and chaotic yet it is observed that Chekov uses the comical aspect of the play to reveal varied human behaviors. Moreover this revelation of characters is reiterated by employing two techniques i.e. the character’s self-revelation and the explication of the fellow characters. Hence by using this technique Chekov presents the readers with an in-depth character analysis where the reader is enlightened about an individual’s personal perspective as well as the manner in which the other people perceive him. Since the commencement of the play Chekov divides the responsibility of each character’s introduction amongst the fellow characters as it is also apparent from the fact that rather than using stage directions or any other technique he utilizes dialogues as a mode for explaining the characters of Lemov and Natalia. Lemov represents a young nervous man who is at a point in life where he badly desires to get settled though he is agitated at broaching the subject with the respective bride’s father Tschub. This hesitation is highly apparent in the lines where he says, â€Å"It is not the first time I have had the honor of turning to you for assistance†¦ I beg your pardon I am a bit excited I’ll take a drink of water first† (Chekov 499). These lines depict his restlessness as well as provide the readers with an interesting insight about his character that he is a young man at brink of committing himself in a matrimonial relationship and the whole process of asking for Tschub’s daughter’s hand makes him jittery. Lemov’s dialogues also enlighten the readers about the reasons for marrying Natalia as he says, â€Å"I’m cold†¦the chief thing is to settle matters†¦I’m thirty-five a critical age you might say†¦I must live a well regulated life† (Chekov 500). In other words Lemov represents a guy in the prime age of getting married, who has a bad case of nerves about committing himself in a binding relationship. However he is brave enough to be willing to take the plunge because of his stature in life and the requirement of his health i.e. he believes having a wife will cure him from a bad heart. Moreover he is a man who has the habit of either talking in riddles or straying from the actual topic as it is evident from his failed attempts of proposing to Natalia. As time and again he says, â€Å"Only listen until I have finished†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (Chekov 502) rather than coming directly to the point he keeps getting in arguments with Natalia because of his lack of being able to steer the conversation in the right direction. Moreover through his assertions the readers realize that he considers himself a self-righteous and a fair man which is again concluded from his assertion, â€Å"my lady I have never appropriated other people’s property and I shall permit no one to accuse me of such a thing† (Chekov 503). His indignation further highlights his personality traits to the readers although Natalia believes otherwise. However it cannot be denied that he is a highly principled individual yet he has a kind heart and has the tendency of eventually giving in to an argument. This is apparent from the lines, â€Å"it was only principle of the thing the property isn’t worth much to me but the principle is worth a great deal† (Chekov 507). These parallels of opinions about Lemov’s character i.e. his personal opinion about himself and